Abductive arguments Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Which sentence is a non-proposition? - If the burglar did not go out the front door, they must have gone out a window. - The earth is the third planet from the sun. - Where are the keys to my car? - Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world. - ANSWERSWhere are the keys to my car? Did the company really close that deal? It has had a great year. Where is the president right now? Let's go ask whether the deal was closed. In the above paragraph, which sentence expresses a propo...

________ ________ is self-guided and self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality - ANSWER critical thinking A critical thinker will discover ways to improve its surroundings by contributing to a more ________ civilized society - ANSWER rational Assuming that other individuals will act just the way another particular person does is called - ANSWER mirror imaging An unconscious belief that conditions, governs, and compels our behavior is known as a -...

The third exam for PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking, taught by Thomas J. Brommage, will cover various topics related to critical thinking. Inductive arguments are claims about the world that provide evidence for why we should believe or act according to the claim. On the other hand, abductive arguments offer proposed explanations for a set of facts or evidence. Induction by enumeration involves generalizing from a set of instances describing properties or relations. Reductio ad absurdum argues again...

Arguments are collections of statements that are used to logically support a specific point. They consist of premises, which justify the conclusion, and the logical form that connects the premises to the conclusion. Premises and conclusions are statements that are declarative in grammatical form, factual, and in principle verifiable. Certain words or phrases, known as "tell words," can be used to identify whether a statement is a premise or a conclusion. Common tell words include "therefor...

PHI 103 QUIZ 4 | RATED 100%PHI 103 QUIZ 4 Question 1 1 / 1 pts The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation: Is it indubitably true? Does it help us explain other phenomena as well? Is there proof of it? Does the result seem important? Question 2 1 / 1 pts This philosopher claimed that science should focus on falsifiability rather than confirmation. Karl Popper Friedrich Nietzsche Ludwig Wittgenstein Galileo Question 3 1 / 1 ...

Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265(Lesson Questions and terms)Correctly Answered!! Which sentence is a non-proposition? - If the burglar did not go out the front door, they must have gone out a window. - The earth is the third planet from the sun. - Where are the keys to my car? - Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world. Where are the keys to my car? Did the company really close that deal? It has had a great year. Where is the president right now? Let's go ask whe...

Which sentence is a non-proposition? - If the burglar did not go out the front door, they must have gone out a window. - The earth is the third planet from the sun. - Where are the keys to my car? - Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world. - answer-Where are the keys to my car? Did the company really close that deal? It has had a great year. Where is the president right now? Let's go ask whether the deal was closed. In the above paragraph, which sentence expresses a propo...

Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence D265 Which sentence is a non-proposition? - If the burglar did not go out the front door, they must have gone out a window. - The earth is the third planet from the sun. - Where are the keys to my car? - Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world. - ANS Where are the keys to my car? Did the company really close that deal? It has had a great year. Where is the president right now? Let's go ask whether the deal was closed. In the ab...

Causal explanations are different from inductive arguments as they provide explanations rather than conclusions. There are two types of explanations: reason explanations and causal explanations. Reason explanations provide a purpose or goal, while causal explanations explain what caused something to happen. When evaluating causal explanations, it is important to consider the difference between causation and correlation. A fallacy of causal reasoning is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, which fails to d...

D265 - Section 1 premise - ANS a proposition lending credence to the conclusion ; provide a reason for thinking the conclusion is true ; made up of claims, evidence, ideas, etc. intended to support the conclusion conclusion indicators - ANS these feel conclusive and have the general sense of "I have told you some things or I am about to tell you some things, now here is what I want you to believe" -common examples: therefore, so, it follows that, hence, thus, entails that, we may co...